Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is often dismissed as a marketing exercise or compliance checkbox. But a new empirical study shows that when companies combine CSR with internal learning, they can significantly boost their sustainability performance — not just on paper, but in real-world economic, environmental, and social outcomes.
This doesn’t just matter for firms in China (where the study was conducted). The lessons are globally relevant — especially in Canada, Scandinavia, and Northern Europe, where industries are increasingly under pressure to decarbonise, raise labour standards, and stay competitive while meeting ambitious sustainability goals.
Proactive vs Reactive CSR: It’s Not Just Image — It’s Strategy + Learning
The study separates CSR into two types:
Proactive CSR — voluntary, forward-looking initiatives (e.g., green innovation, long-term sustainability investments)
Reactive CSR — compliance-driven or response-based actions (e.g., fixing issues, meeting regulations)
Rather than treating CSR as a one-size-fits-all, the authors argue these two strategies lead to different internal learning mechanisms:
Proactive CSR tends to foster competence exploration — developing new capabilities, innovation, and long-term improvement.
Reactive CSR tends to trigger competence exploitation — refining existing processes, improving efficiency, and consolidating current strengths.
In other words: CSR doesn’t automatically produce sustainability performance — but the right kind of CSR, aligned with internal learning focus, does.
Why This Matters for Northern and Cold-Climate Economies
Many firms in Canada, Scandinavia, the UK, and Northern Europe are in sectors under intense pressure to decarbonise (forestry, manufacturing, energy, mining, transport, heavy industry). They also face regulatory and market demands for higher ESG (environmental, social, governance) standards, stronger resource efficiency, circular economy practices, and clean-energy transitions.
Applying the study’s insights can help such firms:
Use proactive CSR + competence exploration to innovate: e.g. develop cleaner production methods, new materials, renewable-energy integration, circular business models.
Use reactive CSR + competence exploitation to optimise what already exists: e.g. improve energy efficiency, clean up emissions, reduce waste, comply with regulations — without needing radical overhaul.
Align CSR investments to strategic goals. For example: a company launching a renewable-energy plant benefits from exploration-driven CSR; a legacy manufacturer under regulatory pressure may see better returns with exploitation-driven CSR.
For economies with mixed old and new industry — such as remote Canadian provinces or industrial regions in Scandinavia — this dual-path CSR strategy offers a pragmatic bridge between tradition and transition.
CSR + Learning = Sustainable Performance — Evidence, Not Wishful Thinking
The study surveyed 248 high-tech firms and used robust statistical mediation analyses. It found:
Proactive CSR significantly increased sustainability performance via competence exploration (β ≈ 0.27; p<0.01)
Reactive CSR improved sustainability performance via competence exploitation (β ≈ 0.24; p<0.01)
Combining CSR with organisational learning was more effective than CSR alone
These numbers show a clear, quantifiable benefit — not just vague correlation. That robustness makes the findings strong enough for European or North American firms to take seriously.
What Firms and Policymakers Should Do — Especially in the North
Recognise that CSR is not one thing — distinguish between proactive and reactive strategies depending on your goals.
Encourage internal learning capabilities — R&D, training, process improvement — alongside external sustainability goals.
For traditional industries (mining, heavy manufacturing, utilities), start with reactive CSR + competence exploitation to raise baseline sustainability.
For green-tech, clean-energy, circular economy or renewable-energy sectors, deploy proactive CSR + competence exploration to drive innovation and transformation.
Embed CSR + learning orientation into regional industrial policy — e.g., support for retraining workers, incentives for clean-tech R&D, grants for sustainable innovation, especially in regions like Atlantic Canada, Northern Scandinavia, Northern UK.
Why This Paper Deserves More Attention
This study does what many CSR/CSP papers don’t: it moves beyond just “does CSR correlate with good outcomes?” — and instead reveals how and why CSR leads to sustainability, via organizational learning mechanisms. That makes CSR not a fuzzy moral choice, but a strategic lever for continuous improvement.
In fast-changing economic environments — the green transition is one of them — the ability to learn, adapt, and improve internally is probably the most reliable competitive advantage a firm can have.
For northern-climate, resource-intensive economies balancing tradition with decarbonisation, it may be the most important one.
Source
Proactive and reactive CSR and sustainability performance: Knowledge and organizational learning, Elsevier, 2025-11-16
Boˆreal 