To consumers, mentions of the circular economy can range from greenwashing or vagueness. But a new paper led by Roskilde University, near Copenhagen [55.65°N, 12.14°E] takes those critiques head-on. Based on current case studies, it shows that circular systems work — and scale healthily.
For Canada and Northern Europe, where climate adaptation and industrial decarbonisation are urgent, these findings matter. They confirm that circular models are not just theoretical; they can strengthen local economies, cut emissions, and reduce dependence on virgin materials — key priorities for resource-intensive sectors in cold-weather economies.
1. The Circular Economy Is a Smart Integration
Criticisms that the paper addresses include the notion that circular economy principles previous existed under other names. That’s a strength: The concept of a Circular Economy intentionally combines proven strategies — industrial ecology, design for reuse, green growth — into a single, practical framework.
In countries with strong engineering and manufacturing legacies, such as Germany, Sweden, Norway, and Canada, this bundling is why circular approaches have been taken up by policymakers and industry leaders rather than remaining academic theory.
2. It’s Not About “Perfect Loops”
Another common claim is that a Circular Economy promises unrealistic perfection. In reality, the paper shows that the best-supported definitions don’t aim for 100% circularity, which is thermodynamically impossible. Instead, they aim to minimise material “leakage,” prioritising reuse and high-value recycling where it delivers real environmental benefit.
That clarity matters in cold-climate economies with carbon-heavy infrastructure. Reuse strategies for steel, cement, and engineered timber can cut emissions dramatically, without waiting for futuristic closed-loop systems.
3. Evidence is Catching Up With the Theory
One of the strongest points in the paper is that empirical evidence is now arriving at scale. For example:
Product-service systems (where people access products rather than own them) can reduce emissions by up to 80%
Recycled cotton denim powered by combined heat and power plants shows 50–98% reductions in multiple environmental impacts
In the building industry alone, circular design can reduce greenhouse gas emissions by over 60%
These are not lab-scale experiments. They are commercial, scalable and—crucially—compatible with the needs of regions like Scandinavia, Scotland, and Canada, where heating, construction, and heavy industry dominate energy use.
4. Circular Economy Research Is Getting More Sophisticated
The paper shows the Circular Economy has matured into an academically robust field.
It’s now the fastest-growing sustainability research area worldwide, with thousands of publications per year.
Researchers map more than waste flows. They are modelling land use, energy, material stockpiles, and urban infrastructure at national scale. New satellite-based material-stock analysis (using Copernicus data) is especially relevant for Northern Europe and Canada, where remote industrial and urban infrastructure spans vast territory.
5. Technology Isn’t the Whole Story
Perhaps the most powerful contribution of this paper is the reminder that circularity is not merely a technical vision.
A “circular society” is emerging as a recognised research field that includes:
- social equity
- fair transitions
- consumer behaviour
- culture and policy
In fact, more than one-third of current CE researchers now come from the social sciences, not engineering. That is a sign of a movement maturing beyond theory and into lived reality.
6. The Circular Economy is Being Implemented — Just Not Always Measured
The paper directly contradicts the criticism that the Circular Economy doesn’t scale up in real life.
Hundreds of circular start-ups have launched across Europe. Major companies — Patagonia, IKEA, H&M, Adidas, Tesla — run operational circular programs.
Canada and Northern Europe already lead on high-performing consumer return schemes, especially for electronics and beverage packaging. These are practical, proven examples of circularity with recycling rates above 90%.
The remaining challenge isn’t just adoption, but measurement. But, to this end, various international bodies are developing consistent global reporting standards to complement practice.
Why This Matters for Canada and Northern Europe
Cold-climate economies face unique sustainability pressures:
- energy-intensive heating
- long supply chains
- resource extraction industries
- hard-to-abate construction and heavy manufacturing
The research shows circular systems can reduce emissions and resource use in exactly these sectors. Circular construction alone provides double wins: lower emissions now, and materials that can be extracted and reused decades later instead of being lost to landfill. The same applies to metals, plastics, biomass, and critical minerals — central pillars of northern economies.
This paper is a timely message to policymakers, investors, and engineers who still wonder if circularity is “real”. According to the evidence: it is, it works, and it’s accelerating.
Source
A Defense of the Circular Economy, Journal of Industrial Ecology 2025;1–18, 2025-11-07
Boˆreal 