Hydrogen has long been hailed as the clean energy solution that could free us from fossil fuels. It stores well, burns clean, and can be used across sectors — from transportation to heavy industry. But how to produce it sustainably, affordably, and consistently, especially using only wind and solar power?
In a detailed new study, a team of engineers at the China University of Mining and Technology in Xuzhou [34.2°N ,117.1°E] have tackled one of the trickiest problems in hydrogen production: how to ensure reliable power delivery to hydrogen-producing systems, even when the wind fades or the sun is slow to rise.
Their solution — a two-stage power optimisation system — doesn’t rely on expensive new infrastructure. It relies on intelligence and timing. The approach might sound technical, but its goal is simple: store energy when you don’t need it, and use it wisely when you do.
This is not just a win for China. As regions across Scandinavia, Scotland and Canada increasingly explore hydrogen as part of their energy mix, particularly in off-grid or remote locations, these findings offer a fresh model for how to do it right.
Hydrogen Production Challenges
When you produce hydrogen using electrolysis (splitting water with electricity), the power supply needs to be stable. But wind and solar don’t always cooperate. On some days, the sky delivers more energy than you can use. On others, it delivers none at all.
A system that tries to make hydrogen directly from the wind or sun — without a plan — ends up wasting power, stressing its equipment, or shutting down entirely. That’s inefficient and expensive.
To solve this, engineers increasingly turn to hybrid energy storage systems (HESS), which combine batteries and supercapacitors. One stores lots of energy. The other can release it quickly when needed. But coordinating these components in real time, under real weather conditions, is no small task.
The Two-Stage Strategy
This study proposes a clear two-part solution:
1. Rule-Based Reasoning
First, the system uses a smart set of rules to decide — second by second — how much power should go to:
- The electrolyzer (which makes the hydrogen),
- The battery (which stores energy long-term), and
- The supercapacitor (which handles short bursts).
If there’s more wind or solar than needed, the system stores the extra energy — choosing whether to charge the battery or supercapacitor based on what’s available and what might be needed later.
If there’s less renewable energy, it uses what’s stored — but again, with care. The rules factor in:
- Whether the electrolyser can operate safely at a lower level,
- Whether it’s better to run at reduced speed, or not at all,
- Whether to preserve some battery power in case things get worse.
This first stage is designed to be fast and stable, but not perfect. That’s where the second stage comes in.
2. Algorithmic Fine-Tuning
Once the urgent decisions are made, a smart algorithm — specifically, an improved particle swarm optimisation method — goes to work.
Its job is to fine-tune the energy distribution to:
- Reduce hydrogen production costs (by avoiding waste),
- Prolong battery life (by minimising how deeply batteries are discharged),
- Smooth out the system so that power delivery is consistent over time.
It’s a bit like having an assistant chef taste your dish and adjust the seasoning — after you’ve already cooked it to a decent level.
What’s Different About This System?
Unlike many systems that respond only to what’s happening now, this one looks ahead. It keeps a portion of energy stored in reserve, even when it could use it right away, to guard against future shortages.
This is especially important in regions with unpredictable weather or long winters — think northern Sweden, off-grid Norway, or remote Canadian outposts — where “running out of energy” could mean real disruption.
The method also recognises that hydrogen production systems don’t always work best at full throttle. By mapping out the electrolyser’s behaviour at different power levels, the team could run it more efficiently and safely, rather than simply “on or off.”
Does It Work? The Results Say Yes
The researchers tested their system against three conventional strategies. Here’s what they found:
- Hydrogen production increased by up to 22% compared to traditional methods
- Power shortages dropped by over 50%
- Shutdown events were cut by 70%
- The cost per kilogram of hydrogen was reduced to 25.37 CNY (roughly €3.25 or CAD$4.80), lower than all the alternatives
- And critically, it reduced the waste of renewable energy by improving how surplus power was stored
In other words, more hydrogen, for less money, with fewer interruptions and less environmental waste.
Why It Matters Beyond China
Off-grid hydrogen production has a natural fit in northern countries, where remote communities, rugged terrain, and ambitious clean energy goals intersect. From powering Arctic research stations to fuelling ferries or trucks, hydrogen made on-site from local wind or solar could transform energy systems — if it can be made stable and cost-effective.
What this research shows is that we don’t always need new machines or massive upgrades. Sometimes, the answer lies in better co-ordination, smarter software, and the simple wisdom of not using everything you’ve got at once.
In the future, the question might not just be “Where can we generate hydrogen?” but “How well can we manage the energy we already have?”
This two-stage approach offers a compelling answer.
Source
Two-Stage Collaborative Power Optimization for Off-Grid Wind–Solar Hydrogen Production Systems Considering Reserved Energy of Storage, Energies, 2025-06-04
Boˆreal 